Belarus vs Kyrgyzstan: Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Belarus
55.0%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
55.2%
in 2020
Belarus rank
7th
Kyrgyzstan rank
6th
Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Belarus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 55.2% against 55.0% in Belarus, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 7th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th of 33 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 55.2% against 55.0% in Belarus as of 2020.
- What is the difference in coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.2%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Belarus ranks 7th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Social Insurance programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)