Peru vs South Africa: Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural
Peru
98.1%
in 2022
South Africa
96.2%
in 2021
Peru rank
2nd
South Africa rank
3rd
Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
Peru currently reports 98.1% against 96.2% in South Africa, a difference of 1.9%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 2nd and South Africa ranks 3rd of 37 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 91.1% | 93.6% | 2.5% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 97.8% | 95.7% | 2.0% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance -rural, Peru or South Africa?
- Peru, at 98.1% against 96.2% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance -rural between Peru and South Africa?
- 1.9%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance -rural?
- Peru ranks 2nd and South Africa ranks 3rd of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Social Assistance programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)