Mongolia vs South Africa: Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural
Mongolia
94.6%
in 2020
South Africa
88.3%
in 2021
Mongolia rank
1st
South Africa rank
2nd
Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural over time
- Mongolia
- South Africa
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 94.6% against 88.3% in South Africa, a difference of 6.3%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 1st and South Africa ranks 2nd of 27 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 91.1% | 84.5% | 6.5% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 94.6% | 94.2% | 0.4% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers -rural, Mongolia or South Africa?
- Mongolia, at 94.6% against 88.3% in South Africa as of 2020.
- What is the difference in coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers -rural between Mongolia and South Africa?
- 6.3%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and South Africa rank globally for coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers -rural?
- Mongolia ranks 1st and South Africa ranks 2nd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Cash Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)