Brazil vs Kyrgyzstan: Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
Brazil
5.4%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
3.4%
in 2020
Brazil rank
25th
Kyrgyzstan rank
28th
Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural over time
- Brazil
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 5.4% against 3.4% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 2.0%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.6 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Brazil ranks 25th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 28th of 30 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.8% | 5.3% | 0.5% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 4.8% | 3.4% | 1.4% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers -rural, Brazil or Kyrgyzstan?
- Brazil, at 5.4% against 3.4% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers -rural between Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.0%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers -rural?
- Brazil ranks 25th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 28th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Domestic Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)