Mongolia vs Peru: Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural
Mongolia
98.3%
in 2020
Peru
98.9%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
3rd
Peru rank
2nd
Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 98.9% against 98.3% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 3rd and Peru ranks 2nd of 37 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.0% | 87.3% | 8.8% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 98.3% | 91.7% | 6.5% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 98.3% | 97.4% | 1.0% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and labor -rural, Mongolia or Peru?
- Peru, at 98.9% against 98.3% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and labor -rural between Mongolia and Peru?
- 0.6%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for coverage in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and labor -rural?
- Mongolia ranks 3rd and Peru ranks 2nd of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Social Protection and Labor programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)