Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Kyrgyzstan
52.8%
in 2020
Poland
53.4%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
7th
Poland rank
6th
Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 53.4% against 52.8% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th and Poland ranks 6th of 33 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.0% | 51.7% | 24.7% | Poland |
| 2010s | 41.4% | 50.5% | 9.1% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Poland, at 53.4% against 52.8% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 0.6%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th and Poland ranks 6th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Social Insurance programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)