Chile vs Poland: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers
Chile
51.0%
in 2022
Poland
64.3%
in 2019
Chile rank
10th
Poland rank
7th
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers over time
- Chile
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 64.3% against 51.0% in Chile, a difference of 13.3%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.3 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Chile ranks 10th and Poland ranks 7th of 29 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.3% | 47.6% | 3.3% | Poland |
| 2010s | 43.1% | 38.3% | 4.8% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash transfers, Chile or Poland?
- Poland, at 64.3% against 51.0% in Chile as of 2019.
- What is the difference in coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash transfers between Chile and Poland?
- 13.3%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Poland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Chile and Poland rank globally for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash transfers?
- Chile ranks 10th and Poland ranks 7th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Cash Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)