Belarus vs El Salvador: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers
Belarus
31.8%
in 2019
El Salvador
32.1%
in 2022
Belarus rank
15th
El Salvador rank
14th
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers over time
- Belarus
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 32.1% against 31.8% in Belarus, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 15th and El Salvador ranks 14th of 29 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.0% | 2.8% | 40.2% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 44.2% | 5.1% | 39.1% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash transfers, Belarus or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 32.1% against 31.8% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash transfers between Belarus and El Salvador?
- 0.3%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and El Salvador?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2014.
- How do Belarus and El Salvador rank globally for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash transfers?
- Belarus ranks 15th and El Salvador ranks 14th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Cash Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)