Belarus vs Poland: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers
Belarus
48.0%
in 2019
Poland
70.1%
in 2019
Belarus rank
11th
Poland rank
8th
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers over time
- Belarus
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 70.1% against 48.0% in Belarus, a difference of 22.1%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.5 times Belarus's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 11th and Poland ranks 8th of 27 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.5% | 58.1% | 4.6% | Poland |
| 2010s | 41.8% | 52.4% | 10.5% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash transfers, Belarus or Poland?
- Poland, at 70.1% against 48.0% in Belarus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash transfers between Belarus and Poland?
- 22.1%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Poland rank globally for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash transfers?
- Belarus ranks 11th and Poland ranks 8th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Cash Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)