Armenia vs Chile: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers
Armenia
46.3%
in 2022
Chile
50.6%
in 2022
Armenia rank
12th
Chile rank
11th
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers over time
- Armenia
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 50.6% against 46.3% in Armenia, a difference of 4.3%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Chile ahead.
Armenia ranks 12th and Chile ranks 11th of 30 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.3% | 60.5% | 27.1% | Chile |
| 2010s | 33.3% | 43.4% | 10.0% | Chile |
| 2020s | 44.4% | 65.3% | 20.9% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash transfers, Armenia or Chile?
- Chile, at 50.6% against 46.3% in Armenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash transfers between Armenia and Chile?
- 4.3%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Chile?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Chile rank globally for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash transfers?
- Armenia ranks 12th and Chile ranks 11th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Cash Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)