Peru vs South Africa: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Social Pensions
Peru
13.7%
in 2022
South Africa
15.9%
in 2021
Peru rank
11th
South Africa rank
10th
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Social Pensions over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 15.9% against 13.7% in Peru, a difference of 2.2%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was South Africa ahead.
Peru ranks 11th and South Africa ranks 10th of 25 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13.1% | 16.9% | 3.8% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 9.4% | 12.0% | 2.5% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - social pensions, Peru or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 15.9% against 13.7% in Peru as of 2021.
- What is the difference in coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - social pensions between Peru and South Africa?
- 2.2%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - social pensions?
- Peru ranks 11th and South Africa ranks 10th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Social Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Social Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)