Belarus vs Ecuador: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
Belarus
58.0%
in 2019
Ecuador
83.7%
in 2022
Belarus rank
3rd
Ecuador rank
1st
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers over time
- Belarus
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 83.7% against 58.0% in Belarus, a difference of 25.7%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.4 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 3rd and Ecuador ranks 1st of 31 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.6% | 9.5% | 49.1% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 59.5% | 44.4% | 15.0% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private transfers, Belarus or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 83.7% against 58.0% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private transfers between Belarus and Ecuador?
- 25.7%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Belarus ranks 3rd and Ecuador ranks 1st of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Domestic Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)