El Salvador vs Mongolia: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
El Salvador
21.0%
in 2022
Mongolia
18.0%
in 2020
El Salvador rank
19th
Mongolia rank
22nd
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers over time
- El Salvador
- Mongolia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 21.0% against 18.0% in Mongolia, a difference of 3.0%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 19th and Mongolia ranks 22nd of 31 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.5% | 17.1% | 6.4% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 19.9% | 15.8% | 4.1% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private transfers, El Salvador or Mongolia?
- El Salvador, at 21.0% against 18.0% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private transfers between El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 3.0%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do El Salvador and Mongolia rank globally for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private transfers?
- El Salvador ranks 19th and Mongolia ranks 22nd of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Domestic Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)