Peru vs South Africa: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and
Peru
95.5%
in 2022
South Africa
94.6%
in 2021
Peru rank
5th
South Africa rank
6th
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
Peru currently reports 95.5% against 94.6% in South Africa, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was South Africa ahead.
Peru ranks 5th and South Africa ranks 6th of 39 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 89.0% | 94.4% | 5.5% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 90.2% | 94.8% | 4.6% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social protection and, Peru or South Africa?
- Peru, at 95.5% against 94.6% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social protection and between Peru and South Africa?
- 0.9%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social protection and?
- Peru ranks 5th and South Africa ranks 6th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Social Protection and Labor programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)