Peru vs South Africa: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -urban
Peru
92.4%
in 2022
South Africa
94.1%
in 2021
Peru rank
7th
South Africa rank
4th
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -urban over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 94.1% against 92.4% in Peru, a difference of 1.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was South Africa ahead.
Peru ranks 7th and South Africa ranks 4th of 39 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 80.4% | 90.7% | 10.3% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 84.9% | 93.1% | 8.2% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social assistance -urban, Peru or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 94.1% against 92.4% in Peru as of 2021.
- What is the difference in coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social assistance -urban between Peru and South Africa?
- 1.7%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social assistance -urban?
- Peru ranks 7th and South Africa ranks 4th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Social Assistance programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)