Mexico vs United States of America: Collective bargaining coverage rate
Collective bargaining coverage rate over time
- Mexico
- United States of America
How they compare
United States of America currently reports 12.1 against 10.4 in Mexico, a difference of 1.7.
That makes United States of America's figure about 1.2 times Mexico's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 52nd and United States of America ranks 49th of 68 countries.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | United States of America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.65 | 13.05 | 3.4 | United States of America |
| 2010s | 10.12 | 11.93 | 1.81 | United States of America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher collective bargaining coverage rate, Mexico or United States of America?
- United States of America, at 12.1 against 10.4 in Mexico as of 2020.
- What is the difference in collective bargaining coverage rate between Mexico and United States of America?
- 1.7, with United States of America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and United States of America?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Mexico and United States of America rank globally for collective bargaining coverage rate?
- Mexico ranks 52nd and United States of America ranks 49th of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Collective bargaining coverage rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The collective bargaining coverage rate conveys the number of employees whose pay and/or conditions of employment are determined by one or more collective agreement(s) as a percentage of the total number of employees. Collective bargaining coverage includes, to the extent possible, workers covered by collective agreements in virtue of their extension. Collective bargaining coverage rates are adjusted for the possibility that some workers do not have the right to bargain collectively over wages (e.g. workers in the public services who have their wages determined by state regulation or other methods involving consultation), unless otherwise stated in the notes. The statistics presented in this table result from an ILO data compilation effort (including an annual questionnaire and numerous special enquiries), with contributions from J. Visser. For more information, refer to the Industrial Relations data (IRdata) database description.