Japan vs Poland: Collective bargaining coverage rate
Collective bargaining coverage rate over time
- Japan
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 17.2 against 16.8 in Japan, a difference of 0.4.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Poland ahead.
Japan ranks 44th and Poland ranks 43rd of 68 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.83 | 20.87 | 2.03 | Poland |
| 2010s | 18.2 | 17.9 | 0.3 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher collective bargaining coverage rate, Japan or Poland?
- Poland, at 17.2 against 16.8 in Japan as of 2015.
- What is the difference in collective bargaining coverage rate between Japan and Poland?
- 0.4, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2015.
- How do Japan and Poland rank globally for collective bargaining coverage rate?
- Japan ranks 44th and Poland ranks 43rd of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Collective bargaining coverage rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The collective bargaining coverage rate conveys the number of employees whose pay and/or conditions of employment are determined by one or more collective agreement(s) as a percentage of the total number of employees. Collective bargaining coverage includes, to the extent possible, workers covered by collective agreements in virtue of their extension. Collective bargaining coverage rates are adjusted for the possibility that some workers do not have the right to bargain collectively over wages (e.g. workers in the public services who have their wages determined by state regulation or other methods involving consultation), unless otherwise stated in the notes. The statistics presented in this table result from an ILO data compilation effort (including an annual questionnaire and numerous special enquiries), with contributions from J. Visser. For more information, refer to the Industrial Relations data (IRdata) database description.