Rwanda vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cases of non-fatal occupational injury
Cases of non-fatal occupational injury over time
- Rwanda
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 973 against 833 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 140.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Trinidad and Tobago's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Rwanda ranks 90th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 92nd of 126 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 319 | 1,041 | 722.33 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 1990s | 692.33 | 479 | 213.33 | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 973 | 444 | 529 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cases of non-fatal occupational injury, Rwanda or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Rwanda, at 973 against 833 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2000.
- What is the difference in cases of non-fatal occupational injury between Rwanda and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 140, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2000.
- How do Rwanda and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for cases of non-fatal occupational injury?
- Rwanda ranks 90th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 92nd of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Cases of non-fatal occupational injury. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A case of non-fatal occupational injury is the case of a worker incurring an occupational injury as a result of an occupational accident not leading to death. The non-fatal occupational injury entails a loss of working time. Data disaggregated by economic activity are provided according to the latest version of the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC) available for that year. Data may have been regrouped from national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISIC. For more information, refer to the Occupational Safety and Health Statistics (OSH) database description.