New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Cases of non-fatal occupational injury
Cases of non-fatal occupational injury over time
- New Caledonia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 4,596 against 4,141 in New Caledonia, a difference of 455.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was New Caledonia ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 66th and Zimbabwe ranks 64th of 126 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cases of non-fatal occupational injury, New Caledonia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 4,596 against 4,141 in New Caledonia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in cases of non-fatal occupational injury between New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
- 455, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2015.
- How do New Caledonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for cases of non-fatal occupational injury?
- New Caledonia ranks 66th and Zimbabwe ranks 64th of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Cases of non-fatal occupational injury. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A case of non-fatal occupational injury is the case of a worker incurring an occupational injury as a result of an occupational accident not leading to death. The non-fatal occupational injury entails a loss of working time. Data disaggregated by economic activity are provided according to the latest version of the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC) available for that year. Data may have been regrouped from national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISIC. For more information, refer to the Occupational Safety and Health Statistics (OSH) database description.