Rwanda vs Zambia: Care employment outside the formal sector
Care employment outside the formal sector over time
- Rwanda
- Zambia
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 200.47 against 197.09 in Zambia, a difference of 3.38.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 20th and Zambia ranks 22nd of 43 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 222.52 | 137.6 | 84.93 | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 167.42 | 133.86 | 33.56 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher care employment outside the formal sector, Rwanda or Zambia?
- Rwanda, at 200.47 against 197.09 in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in care employment outside the formal sector between Rwanda and Zambia?
- 3.38, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Zambia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Zambia rank globally for care employment outside the formal sector?
- Rwanda ranks 20th and Zambia ranks 22nd of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Care employment outside the formal sector (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for employment outside the formal sector is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Worker and Sector Profiles (PROF) database description.