El Salvador vs Paraguay: Benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - International
El Salvador
0.1%
in 2022
Paraguay
0.2%
in 2022
El Salvador rank
13th
Paraguay rank
10th
Benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - International over time
- El Salvador
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 0.2% against 0.1% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 2.3 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Paraguay ahead.
El Salvador ranks 13th and Paraguay ranks 10th of 27 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Paraguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.1% | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.1% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.2% | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - international, El Salvador or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 0.2% against 0.1% in El Salvador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - international between El Salvador and Paraguay?
- 0.1%, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Paraguay?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2022.
- How do El Salvador and Paraguay rank globally for benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - international?
- El Salvador ranks 13th and Paraguay ranks 10th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the extreme poor (those below $125 a day) relative to the total benefits going to the population