Dominican Republic vs Pakistan: Benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - International
Dominican Republic
0.2%
in 2021
Pakistan
0.8%
in 2018
Dominican Republic rank
8th
Pakistan rank
5th
Benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - International over time
- Dominican Republic
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0.8% against 0.2% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.6%.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 4.0 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Pakistan ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 8th and Pakistan ranks 5th of 27 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4% | 1.0% | 0.7% | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.0% | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - international, Dominican Republic or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 0.8% against 0.2% in Dominican Republic as of 2018.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - international between Dominican Republic and Pakistan?
- 0.6%, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Pakistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Dominican Republic and Pakistan rank globally for benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - international?
- Dominican Republic ranks 8th and Pakistan ranks 5th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the extreme poor (those below $125 a day) relative to the total benefits going to the population