Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers
Costa Rica
13.4%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
14.8%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
18th
Kyrgyzstan rank
15th
Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 14.8% against 13.4% in Costa Rica, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 18th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 24 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 12.4% | 13.6% | 1.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 17.4% | 14.8% | 2.6% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 14.8% against 13.4% in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.4%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers?
- Costa Rica ranks 18th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the fourth quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population