Peru vs South Africa: Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private
Peru
20.3%
in 2022
South Africa
20.2%
in 2021
Peru rank
16th
South Africa rank
17th
Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
Peru currently reports 20.3% against 20.2% in South Africa, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was South Africa ahead.
Peru ranks 16th and South Africa ranks 17th of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 22.0% | 21.0% | 1.0% | Peru |
| 2020s | 19.4% | 21.4% | 2.0% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private, Peru or South Africa?
- Peru, at 20.3% against 20.2% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private between Peru and South Africa?
- 0.1%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private?
- Peru ranks 16th and South Africa ranks 17th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the fourth quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population