Peru vs Serbia: Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private
Peru
20.3%
in 2022
Serbia
21.7%
in 2022
Peru rank
16th
Serbia rank
13th
Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Peru
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 21.7% against 20.3% in Peru, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 16th and Serbia ranks 13th of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 22.2% | 20.9% | 1.4% | Peru |
| 2020s | 21.7% | 23.8% | 2.2% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private, Peru or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 21.7% against 20.3% in Peru as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private between Peru and Serbia?
- 1.4%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Peru and Serbia rank globally for benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private?
- Peru ranks 16th and Serbia ranks 13th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the fourth quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population