Peru vs South Africa: Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private
Peru
22.4%
in 2022
South Africa
24.7%
in 2021
Peru rank
13th
South Africa rank
10th
Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 24.7% against 22.4% in Peru, a difference of 2.3%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was South Africa ahead.
Peru ranks 13th and South Africa ranks 10th of 27 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 19.2% | 22.0% | 2.8% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 20.3% | 22.9% | 2.6% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private, Peru or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 24.7% against 22.4% in Peru as of 2021.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private between Peru and South Africa?
- 2.3%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private?
- Peru ranks 13th and South Africa ranks 10th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the fourth quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population