Ecuador vs Serbia: Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private
Ecuador
43.4%
in 2022
Serbia
29.7%
in 2022
Ecuador rank
1st
Serbia rank
3rd
Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 43.4% against 29.7% in Serbia, a difference of 13.7%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.5 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 1st and Serbia ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 23.3% | 17.2% | 6.1% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 29.9% | 28.6% | 1.3% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private, Ecuador or Serbia?
- Ecuador, at 43.4% against 29.7% in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private between Ecuador and Serbia?
- 13.7%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia rank globally for benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private?
- Ecuador ranks 1st and Serbia ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the fourth quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population