Argentina vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers
Argentina
14.6%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
16.7%
in 2020
Argentina rank
17th
Kyrgyzstan rank
15th
Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers over time
- Argentina
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 16.7% against 14.6% in Argentina, a difference of 2.1%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 17th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 25 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13.4% | 15.6% | 2.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 19.4% | 16.7% | 2.7% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers, Argentina or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 16.7% against 14.6% in Argentina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers between Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.1%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers?
- Argentina ranks 17th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the third quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population