Belarus vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers
Belarus
13.2%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
15.5%
in 2020
Belarus rank
16th
Kyrgyzstan rank
13th
Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers over time
- Belarus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 15.5% against 13.2% in Belarus, a difference of 2.3%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 16th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th of 26 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 15.5% against 13.2% in Belarus as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers between Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.3%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers?
- Belarus ranks 16th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the third quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population