Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
19.2%
in 2017
Kyrgyzstan
18.5%
in 2020
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
17th
Kyrgyzstan rank
20th
Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 19.2% against 18.5% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 17th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 20th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.1% | 15.2% | 2.9% | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
| 2010s | 17.6% | 18.1% | 0.4% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 19.2% against 18.5% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2017.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.7%, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 17th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 20th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the third quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population