Indonesia vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural
Indonesia
20.6%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
19.8%
in 2020
Indonesia rank
19th
Kyrgyzstan rank
22nd
Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural over time
- Indonesia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 20.6% against 19.8% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 19th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 22nd of 34 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 21.3% | 19.7% | 1.6% | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 21.8% | 19.8% | 2.1% | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance -rural, Indonesia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Indonesia, at 20.6% against 19.8% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance -rural between Indonesia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.8%, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
- How do Indonesia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all social assistance -rural?
- Indonesia ranks 19th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 22nd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the third quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population