Indonesia vs Serbia: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers
Indonesia
20.6%
in 2022
Serbia
18.9%
in 2022
Indonesia rank
18th
Serbia rank
20th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers over time
- Indonesia
- Serbia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 20.6% against 18.9% in Serbia, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 18th and Serbia ranks 20th of 26 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 24.0% | 20.1% | 3.9% | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 20.3% | 22.1% | 1.8% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers, Indonesia or Serbia?
- Indonesia, at 20.6% against 18.9% in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers between Indonesia and Serbia?
- 1.7%, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2022.
- How do Indonesia and Serbia rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers?
- Indonesia ranks 18th and Serbia ranks 20th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population