Argentina vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers
Argentina
30.5%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
28.1%
in 2020
Argentina rank
3rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
6th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers over time
- Argentina
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 30.5% against 28.1% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 2.4%.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 3rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th of 26 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 28.3% | 29.6% | 1.3% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 28.7% | 28.1% | 0.5% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers, Argentina or Kyrgyzstan?
- Argentina, at 30.5% against 28.1% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers between Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.4%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers?
- Argentina ranks 3rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population