Kazakhstan vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers
Kazakhstan
24.6%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan
24.7%
in 2020
Kazakhstan rank
7th
Kyrgyzstan rank
6th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers over time
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 24.7% against 24.6% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 7th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th of 25 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 21.6% | 19.1% | 2.5% | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 25.0% | 24.7% | 0.3% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers, Kazakhstan or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 24.7% against 24.6% in Kazakhstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers between Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.1%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers?
- Kazakhstan ranks 7th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population