Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers
Costa Rica
24.4%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
24.7%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
8th
Kyrgyzstan rank
6th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 24.7% against 24.4% in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 8th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th of 25 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 28.6% | 23.1% | 5.5% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 25.1% | 24.7% | 0.4% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 24.7% against 24.4% in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.3%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers?
- Costa Rica ranks 8th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population