Kazakhstan vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers
Kazakhstan
28.3%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan
27.5%
in 2020
Kazakhstan rank
4th
Kyrgyzstan rank
7th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers over time
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 28.3% against 27.5% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 4th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th of 24 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 22.0% | 29.6% | 7.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 28.2% | 27.5% | 0.7% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers, Kazakhstan or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 28.3% against 27.5% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers between Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.8%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers?
- Kazakhstan ranks 4th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population