Indonesia vs Serbia: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers
Indonesia
20.4%
in 2022
Serbia
21.5%
in 2022
Indonesia rank
16th
Serbia rank
15th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers over time
- Indonesia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 21.5% against 20.4% in Indonesia, a difference of 1.1%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 16th and Serbia ranks 15th of 24 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 23.1% | 21.7% | 1.4% | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 19.5% | 23.6% | 4.1% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers, Indonesia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 21.5% against 20.4% in Indonesia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers between Indonesia and Serbia?
- 1.1%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2022.
- How do Indonesia and Serbia rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers?
- Indonesia ranks 16th and Serbia ranks 15th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population