Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers
Chile
27.6%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
27.5%
in 2020
Chile rank
6th
Kyrgyzstan rank
7th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 27.6% against 27.5% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 6th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th of 24 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.5% | 26.3% | 1.2% | Chile |
| 2010s | 26.1% | 23.2% | 2.9% | Chile |
| 2020s | 26.6% | 27.5% | 0.9% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Chile, at 27.6% against 27.5% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.1%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash transfers?
- Chile ranks 6th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population