Kyrgyzstan vs Mexico: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Kyrgyzstan
14.3%
in 2020
Mexico
13.9%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan rank
5th
Mexico rank
6th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Mexico
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 14.3% against 13.9% in Mexico, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Mexico ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th and Mexico ranks 6th of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10.7% | 14.7% | 4.1% | Mexico |
| 2020s | 14.3% | 13.3% | 1.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Kyrgyzstan or Mexico?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 14.3% against 13.9% in Mexico as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Kyrgyzstan and Mexico?
- 0.4%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Mexico?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Mexico rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th and Mexico ranks 6th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population