Armenia vs Poland: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Armenia
14.9%
in 2022
Poland
16.6%
in 2019
Armenia rank
3rd
Poland rank
2nd
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Armenia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 16.6% against 14.9% in Armenia, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 2nd of 27 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.2% | 12.8% | 6.4% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 19.8% | 16.0% | 3.8% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Armenia or Poland?
- Poland, at 16.6% against 14.9% in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Armenia and Poland?
- 1.7%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Poland rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Armenia ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 2nd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population