Belarus vs Peru: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
Belarus
14.5%
in 2019
Peru
15.2%
in 2022
Belarus rank
15th
Peru rank
12th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers over time
- Belarus
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 15.2% against 14.5% in Belarus, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 15th and Peru ranks 12th of 30 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.4% | 11.3% | 4.1% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 14.1% | 11.1% | 3.0% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers, Belarus or Peru?
- Peru, at 15.2% against 14.5% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers between Belarus and Peru?
- 0.7%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Peru?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Peru rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Belarus ranks 15th and Peru ranks 12th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population