Belarus vs Ecuador: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
Belarus
14.5%
in 2019
Ecuador
14.6%
in 2022
Belarus rank
15th
Ecuador rank
14th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers over time
- Belarus
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 14.6% against 14.5% in Belarus, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 15th and Ecuador ranks 14th of 30 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.2% | 13.0% | 3.2% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 14.2% | 15.0% | 0.8% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers, Belarus or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 14.6% against 14.5% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers between Belarus and Ecuador?
- 0.1%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Belarus ranks 15th and Ecuador ranks 14th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population