Dominican Republic vs Peru: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
Dominican Republic
18.5%
in 2021
Peru
17.3%
in 2022
Dominican Republic rank
4th
Peru rank
6th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers over time
- Dominican Republic
- Peru
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 18.5% against 17.3% in Peru, a difference of 1.2%.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Dominican Republic has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 4th and Peru ranks 6th of 31 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.7% | 9.7% | 7.0% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 17.2% | 13.1% | 4.1% | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 18.5% | 16.7% | 1.8% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers, Dominican Republic or Peru?
- Dominican Republic, at 18.5% against 17.3% in Peru as of 2021.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers between Dominican Republic and Peru?
- 1.2%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Peru?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Peru rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Dominican Republic ranks 4th and Peru ranks 6th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population