Dominican Republic vs Kazakhstan: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and
Dominican Republic
15.8%
in 2021
Kazakhstan
17.2%
in 2021
Dominican Republic rank
17th
Kazakhstan rank
16th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and over time
- Dominican Republic
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 17.2% against 15.8% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 17th and Kazakhstan ranks 16th of 37 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.9% | 18.6% | 8.7% | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 13.2% | 17.1% | 4.0% | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 15.8% | 17.2% | 1.3% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and, Dominican Republic or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 17.2% against 15.8% in Dominican Republic as of 2021.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and between Dominican Republic and Kazakhstan?
- 1.4%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Kazakhstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Kazakhstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Dominican Republic ranks 17th and Kazakhstan ranks 16th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population