Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and
Chile
18.1%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
17.6%
in 2020
Chile rank
13th
Kyrgyzstan rank
14th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 18.1% against 17.6% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Chile ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 37 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.0% | 16.8% | 0.8% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 15.6% | 18.5% | 3.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 18.9% | 17.6% | 1.3% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Chile, at 18.1% against 17.6% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.5%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Chile ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population