Kyrgyzstan vs Romania: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Kyrgyzstan
15.7%
in 2020
Romania
14.8%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan rank
7th
Romania rank
9th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Romania
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 15.7% against 14.8% in Romania, a difference of 0.9%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th and Romania ranks 9th of 31 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.4% | 13.2% | 1.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 15.7% | 13.3% | 2.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Kyrgyzstan or Romania?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 15.7% against 14.8% in Romania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Kyrgyzstan and Romania?
- 0.9%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Romania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Romania rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th and Romania ranks 9th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population