Peru vs Serbia: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural
Peru
21.5%
in 2022
Serbia
20.5%
in 2022
Peru rank
23rd
Serbia rank
24th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural over time
- Peru
- Serbia
How they compare
Peru currently reports 21.5% against 20.5% in Serbia, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.
Peru ranks 23rd and Serbia ranks 24th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 24.0% | 21.4% | 2.7% | Peru |
| 2020s | 20.9% | 23.2% | 2.3% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance -rural, Peru or Serbia?
- Peru, at 21.5% against 20.5% in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance -rural between Peru and Serbia?
- 1.0%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Peru and Serbia rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance -rural?
- Peru ranks 23rd and Serbia ranks 24th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population