Kyrgyzstan vs Uruguay: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural
Kyrgyzstan
26.3%
in 2020
Uruguay
26.5%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan rank
3rd
Uruguay rank
2nd
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 26.5% against 26.3% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Uruguay ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd and Uruguay ranks 2nd of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 25.1% | 25.2% | 0.2% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 26.3% | 22.8% | 3.4% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance -rural, Kyrgyzstan or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 26.5% against 26.3% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance -rural between Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 0.2%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance -rural?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd and Uruguay ranks 2nd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population