Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural
Costa Rica
25.6%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
26.3%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
4th
Kyrgyzstan rank
3rd
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 26.3% against 25.6% in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 4th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 24.8% | 23.5% | 1.2% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 22.9% | 26.3% | 3.3% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance -rural, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 26.3% against 25.6% in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance -rural between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.7%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance -rural?
- Costa Rica ranks 4th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population