Brazil vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural
Brazil
25.6%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
26.3%
in 2020
Brazil rank
6th
Kyrgyzstan rank
3rd
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural over time
- Brazil
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 26.3% against 25.6% in Brazil, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Brazil ranks 6th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 34 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 21.3% | 23.9% | 2.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 22.6% | 26.3% | 3.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance -rural, Brazil or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 26.3% against 25.6% in Brazil as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance -rural between Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.7%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance -rural?
- Brazil ranks 6th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population